flu treatments banner

H1N1 vaccine rejected by Poland

The H1N1 vaccine has been rejected by Poland's Health Minister Eva Kopacz, a medical doctor who practised as a family physician for 20 years before she became Health Minister.

In a speech delivered to the Polish Parliament on November 5, Eva Kopacz said she would not authorise the H1N1 vaccine to be given to millions of Polish people when it has not yet been adequately tested for safety.

She said her first duty as Heatth Minister is to act in the best interest of the Polish people, and not in the interest of pharmaceutical companies.

Referring to negotiations between pharmaceutical companies and the Polish government regardinng the purchase of the vaccine, she revealed that the Law Department had "20 points of doubt" regarding the purchase agreement.

The MInister pointed out that there has so far been no information on clinical test results, detailed ingredients and side effects of the H1N1 vaccine. Tests done so far were short-term trials involving a small number of subjects. For example, one test involved just 160 volunteers aged 20-60. Another vaccine was tested on 600 volunteers aged 18-60. Moreover, all the test subjects were healthy, but in real life situations, the H1N1 vaccine would also be administered to people with pre-exisiting health conditions.

Eva Kopacz further noted that in neighbouring Germany, the German public has rejected the H1N1 vaccine even though the Government had bought 50 million doses and offered it to Germans for free. Only 10 percent of the H1N1 vaccine had so far been taken up, even though Germans are normally eager to vaccinate themselves and about 24 percent of Germans regularly receive vaccination for the seasonal flu.

Here is a YouTube video of Eva Kopacz's speech to the Polish government, explaining her reasons for rejecting the H1N1 vaccine as of now.

Below is a transcript of Eva Kopacz's speech about the H1N1 vaccine:

I would like to say that my priority during my 20 odd years of my GP practice was “First of all do not harm,” I took that rule with me to my Health Minister Office.

In situations when I was to recommend a medicine to anybody, I believe just like any other practitioner, I would think: would I give it to my elderly mother, my child?

And exactly such thoughts make me very cautious about double checking the information regarding a medicine that the Health Ministry is to recommend to every Pole - to millions of Poles that have no medical education that a Minister has, that an expert, professor Brydak has, an expert that has been working on the flu for over 40 years. He works in one of 189 flu research centers that are in the world, one is in Poland. Can we today be accused of lack of knowledge about the flu? Can one question an opinion of a professor that has been working on the flu for over 40 years, and not just on one type of flu, that has published hundreds of articles on the subject?

I have just one fundamental question: do we want to fight the flu pandemic?

Today we have knowledge about enclosures in agreements that other governments of wealthier countries have signed with vaccine producers. Also we know what was proposed to Poland. Due to negotiations being in progress I can’t tell you everything today, but I can tell you one thing: our Law Department found at least 20 points of doubt in the agreement.

So what is the Health Minister’s duty? To sign agreements that are in the best interests of the Polish people, or to sign agreements that are in the best interests of the pharmaceutical companies?

I know that there are 3 vaccines available on the market today, of 3 different producers. Each has a different amount of active substance and yet strangely they are all treated the same. Therefore isn’t it fair enough for the Health Minister and health experts to have doubts about it? Maybe the one with trace amounts of active substances is just a “holy water” that we are supposed to think can cure flu? Are we supposed to pay for that?

We have an example of Germany that bought 50 million jabs, only 10 percent have been applied so far. Only 13 percent of Germans want to take this “miraculous cure” today. But it’s peculiar because the Germans have a very high percentage of vaccine takers, so when in Poland for 1000 people only 52 will take a seasonal flu jab, in Germany there will be 238 per 1000.

So what is happening when only 13 percent of Germans want to take the swine flu H1N1 vaccine and not 23 percent of the population as usual with the seasonal flu vaccine? Their government bought the vaccines and offered them for free and they don’t want it. What happened?

Can those facts make us have second thoughts about buying the H1N1 vaccine? Second thoughts about introducing a medicine that is kind of secret?

There are websites on which vaccine producers have an obligation to publish so-called post-vaccine unwanted side effects. The vaccinations in Europe started on 1 October 2009. I would like you to visit any of these websites and find any unwanted side effects. The slightest thing, at least one, like allergic skin rash. That can happen even when using the safest medicine.

There are none on those websites. A “perfect” medicine?! And since this is so miraculous, then why don’t the producing companies want to introduce their medicines to the free market and take responsibility for them? Why wouldn’t they say: “Wonderful, safe medicine, therefore I will take responsibility for it, I will introduce it to the market and everything is clear and transparent,” instead of dropping the weight on us, the buyers.

We do not have clinical test results, no detailed ingredients and no information about side effects. The vaccines are now in the 4th stage of very short tests and we still do not have this information.

Also the sample size has been very little, one kind of vaccine was tested only on 160 volunteers aged 20-60, all healthy. Another kind of vaccine tested on 600 volunteers aged 18-60, all healthy. Is this good enough, especially for us doctors present in the room? It is not good enough for me.

I want to be sure enough to recommend this vaccine. We are not out of the line for the vaccine, during the negotiations we want to take that time and use it to find out as much as we can about the vaccine. Then if the pandemic committee will accept this vaccine, we will buy it.

Also there are 1 billion people with seasonal flu worldwide every year. 1 million people die of seasonal flu worldwide every year. And this hasn’t been going happening for a year or two, but for a very long time. Has anybody anywhere announced a pandemic because of seasonal flu? And the seasonal flu is much more dangerous than swine flu, there are many deaths and severe complications. Was there any pandemic announced?

Those who are pushing me to buy the H1N1 vaccine, I ask you: Why didn’t you scream and shout last year, two years ago and in 2003? In 2003 there were 1.2 million Poles who had seasonal flu! Did anybody shout, here in this room: “Let’s buy vaccines for everybody!” I can’t recall such a thing.

And finally I would like to say only one thing: The Polish nation is very wise, Poles can tell the truth from lies very precisely. They can also tell what is an objective situation and what is just a game.


Click here for another discussion about whether you should take the H1N1 vaccine.


THE FLU
What causes the flu?
What is a pandemic?
Pandemic definition changed
What is H1N1?
H1N1 deaths
Flu deaths
Swine flu
1918 Spanish flu
Germ theory of disease
Flu symptoms
Yin & yang of the flu
Viruses vs bacteria
PNEUMONIA
Causes of pneumonia
What causes pneumonia
Pneumonia from medical care
Is pneumonia contagious
Pneumonia vaccines
Pneumonia vaccine side effects
PCV vaccine for pneumonia
Prevnar vaccine dangers
How long does pneumonia last?
Treating pneumonia naturally
NEWS / COMMENTARIES
Flu shot side effects - more deadly than they seem
Vaccine risks vs lottery odds
Dangerous vaccines - how are they justified?
World rejects swine flu vaccine
Polish Health Minister rejects H1N1 vaccine
H1N1 conspiracy theories
Is H1N1 man-made?
Bubonic plague - shoud we worry?
Flu vaccine ingredients - cynic's response to a funny video
FLU PREVENTION
Prevent the flu naturally
Hydrogen peroxide
Cell membrane structure
Zinc
Vitamin D
Alkaline foods
Umeboshi
Kuzu
Sea salt
Saturated fats
Water - how much to drink?
FLU TREATMENTS
Chinese herbal medicine
Chiropractic care
Osteopathy
Homeopathy
Studies on homeopathy
NATURAL REMEDIES

Flu remedies

Cough
Sore throat
Fever
Natural antibiotics
Probiotics
DRUGS / VACCINES
Anaphylaxis from flu shots
Miscarriages after flu vaccine
Do you need the h1n1 vaccine?
H1N1 vaccine side effects
Guillain Barre Syndrome - worth the "1 in a million" risk?
H1N1 vaccine deaths
Immune adjuvant dangers
Squalene in vaccines
Are flu shots effective?
Flu shot effectiveness - what vaccine inserts say
Vaccine package inserts
Flu shot ingredients
Vaccine side effects
Vaccine deadlier than flu
Ineffectiveness of Tamiflu
Ineffectiveness of Tamiflu II
Tamiflu side effects
No Tamiflu for children
Tamiflu resistance
Relenza and its side effects
Antibiotics - not for flu
WEBSITES BY RICHARD SEAH
The Health Forum
Natural cures
Stop trans fats
Health Promotion Blog
Art Photographs
Photographs of Hands